Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beauty and Warrior

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty and Warrior

Article focuses on a very obscure and poorly-received film. There is no assertion of notability, and I have seen little to support any possible notability this title might have. None of the cast or filmmakers are known, nor are the distributors. All evidence indicates that this title is not notable. Ibaranoff24 (talk) 04:03, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page, as both of these films were distributed by Digiview Entertainment, and the latter has a similar lack of notability:

Comment on Diatron-5 only: The article was entirely unsourced, OR/POV crap, and I tagged it as such a while ago. The only evidence of how it was received-- poorly or not-- is the unsourced opinions of the editors of the article. I've redone the article with what little verifiable information I was able find-- and that sourcing is pretty weak. If others think my editing was too heavy, feel free to revert anything of value that I cut our of the original. (Even the Synopsis was so heavily POV-- pointing out flaws, rip-off sources, etc.-- I cut it.) The director of the film does have a few other credits to his name according to his KMDB entry, including this life of Jesus. According to this bloggish review, the producer of the Australia version, Joseph Lai, is a Hong Kong-based auteur with a bit of a reputation as a schlock-meister, having such gems as Ninja Strike Force in his oeuvre. How this stacks up notability-wise, I don't know. I'll hold off on Keep or Delete pending input from other editors. Dekkappai (talk) 07:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Other editors who bring some knowledge and thought to the discussion, that should read. Dekkappai (talk) 00:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 12:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 12:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both Not enough sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think I smell advertising. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 00:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both for lack of evidence of WP:N. JJL (talk) 00:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Beauty and Warrior. It's not discussed anywhere.
Strong keepof Diatron-5 Only kidding. Delete. Diatron-5 has a reputation as the worst anime ever. An anime fanzine editor said of it that it was "the hands-down lamest anime ever", "The Holy Grail of Lame Anime", "the lamest, cheapest TV show animation you've ever seen, and then ramp it down a notch" and "It's a tremendously crappy movie". More on it here:[1] After seeing a clip on YouTube, I'm sure it is so bad its good, and I will have my $1 ready in Walmart the next time I am that side of the pond. It is mentioned on Transformers Wiki already as a rip-off of the Japanese Diaclone:[2] Best place for it, as there are no reliable sources discussing it. Fences and windows (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.