Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatnik programming language (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beatnik programming language[edit]

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:Complete bollocks Leibniz 15:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete', no demonstrated notability.--Isotope23 19:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it's genuine: see Esolang's page about it, for instance. --ais523 15:55, 18 September 2006 (U T C)

Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.

Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:

No result Votes for Deletion (multiple nomations), September 29 2004
Keep Votes for Deletion (Lazy K), November 26 2004
Delete Articles for Deletion (Obfuscated Weird Language), August 22 2005
Delete 1, keep 2 Articles for Deletion (3 languages including Beatnik), February 24 2006
No result Articles for Deletion (4 languages), February 24 2006
No consensus Articles for Deletion (3 languages), April 5 2006
Delete most Articles for Deletion (multiple nominations), August 31 2006
Overturn and relist Deletion Review, September 7 2006

--ais523 15:53, 18 September 2006 (U T C)

Delete A nice idea, but it's not actually hard to merge into the master list. Not really suitable for future extrapolations and hard to verify. LinaMishima 02:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per the other esolangs above. - Hahnch e n 17:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 20:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.