Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatification and canonization process in 1914

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Reliably sourced subject with a poorly named article. Renaming can be handled outside AFD. RL0919 (talk) 03:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beatification and canonization process in 1914[edit]

Beatification and canonization process in 1914 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic of this article is not encyclopedic. There is nothing special about the year 1914 as it relates the history of changes to the canonization process. This article is poorly sourced and appears to be mostly lifted from the 1913 edition of the Catholic Encyclopedia. Ostealthy (talk) 20:41, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:39, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:41, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and rename. The article is a very good encyclopaedic treatment of a notable subject. It just has nothing much to do with 1914. Possible new name would be Beatification and canonization process (before 1983). Mccapra (talk) 23:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and rename as has reliable sources coverage such as the Catholic encyclopedia. It's not a copyvio as the 1913 encyclopedia is in the public domain and is properly attributed at the bottom of the article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 16:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.