Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bean Ball Benny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Did not redirect, as the potential target is likely to be deleted or redirected itself. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bean Ball Benny[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game. I only know of one reliable independent source that's beyond a trivial mention, but it's hardly worth putting the info in. This article simply has no potential to become fully-developed. Adam9007 (talk) 00:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. It's very rare for cancelled or incomplete software to be notable. The only mention at all on WP:VG/RS's search is in describing the developer while discussing a different unreleased title. -- ferret (talk) 22:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the reliable source I was referring to says that that Bennie (the character) is a Mario clone and has to save a town from some criminals by chasing them through the streets while avoiding obstacles. He has a taxi and some weapons. That's about it. Not really worth an article. Adam9007 (talk) 22:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- here are three magazine articles about it indirectly linked in the article: http://segaretro.org/Bean_Ball_Benny/Magazine_articles JOE BRO 64 22:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

While these are reliable sources, the coverage here is incredibly brief. Not significant enough to create a solid article. --The1337gamer (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unless someone can find more sources with greater depth, this topic seems to fail WP:GNG and lacks significant coverage from reliable independent sources. --The1337gamer (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the article stands now, and per nom, it fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 05:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Nuvision Entertainment. It's a reasonable search term (given the number of times it appears in unreliable sources) about a subject not noteworthy enough to merit its own article. Derek Andrews (talk) 19:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.