Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beachbody

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Whoever wants to merge may do so per WP:BOLD. Clear consensus not to delete the article. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beachbody

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. One source is an own web-site, two others are the same CNN advertorial and the remaining one clearly a press release. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH Velella ^{Velella Talk} 01:03, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Seems to be part of a group of related articles aimed at promoting the organization, it's products, and employees. --Ronz (talk) 02:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: Meets GNG because the CNBC article is a reliable source and has in-depth coverage (with the Cosmo citation, that makes two). It's not completely advertorial because the text includes criticism. Since the page is so scant, it could be merged to P90X. Citrivescence (talk) 17:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The company is best known for P90X which was a workout fad about 10 years back and could be a likely merge target. However, based on this Forbes piece which appeared in print and online from a staff writer and this Los Angeles Times article which isn't flattering, the company meets WP:NCORP. What I would suggest is a merger of the P90X and PiYo pages into the Beachbody page as the others are merely WP:CFORKs of the company's products. It this is kept, ping me and I will be happy to perform the merge. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I agree with Citrivescence. However, this is the company and P90X is one of their products, so we should keep this article and redirect P90X to this article, with a subsection.Zigzig20s (talk) 13:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep mentioned in reliable secondary source, and the creator of the notable P90X product. Wikiman5676 (talk) 03:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are sufficient references meet the criteria for establishing notability. I would recommend that the P90X product page is merged/redirected to here. I've also added in a "criticisms" section as most articles in secondary sources comment critically on the company and the Team Beachbody pyramid selling. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:26, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.