Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bazooka Cafe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 03:32, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bazooka Cafe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic about an adult video game appears to fail WP:GNG. Additional opinion about the notability of video games on Wikipedia can be read at the essay Wikipedia:Notability (video games). Google Books and Google News archive searches are not providing significant coverage in reliable sources. This page was found after searches, but it does not appear to be a reliable source for Wikipedia's purposes. This page at Anime News Network provides only sparse coverage. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question: There might be Japanese sources if anyone knows what the Japanese characters are for the game. It's a long shot, but it's possible.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese title is ぷるるんカフェ. --Odie5533 (talk) 15:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I found some refs in English: Review at GamerTell, AMN news article, 2nd news article, HonestGamers.com review. --Odie5533 (talk) 15:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:42, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ^{talk to me!} 10:13, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk). (included on 01:14, 7 December 2012 (UTC)) — Frankie (talk) 18:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — Frankie (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 13:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:21, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - not notable! BO | Talk 14:17, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per reviews and news articles by Odie5533. Also reviewed by InizioPartita. Cavarrone (talk) 14:39, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.