Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bays Precinct railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus appears to be that this is TOOSOON. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bays Precinct railway station[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Too soon. The location of the station hasn't been announced. http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/b2b/projects/sydney-metro-west-project-overview-nov-2016.pdf says the preferred alignment of the line won't even be announced until late 2018!

Additionally, the Bays Precinct is a large area - the name of the station is unlikely to be "Bays Precinct", and it's possible there may be more than one station serving the area. Gareth (talk) 04:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Our requirements for inclusion do not include that the thing has actually been built, nor that it has a stable name or location. Our requirement is that it is notable. That is, that it is discussed in reliable sources. It is certainly getting some news coverage. SpinningSpark 05:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Spinningspark. Cites have now been added. Lebepoint (talk) 04:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:CRYSTAL point #5 would seem to apply. When this is more than just a product announcement that may or may not come to pass, then an article would be appropriate. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete at most merge and redirect to Bays Precinct. Currently fails GNG, cannot make a more in depth article. Just much TOOSOON. Aoziwe (talk) 04:08, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 talk contribs 18:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WAY to soonJkd4855 (talk) 02:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree that this is TOOSOON and there is not enough concrete information for an article yet. MB 03:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.