Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bay Area Asian Unity
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 19:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bay Area Asian Unity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I previously nominated this article for speedy deletion as blatant advertising. Author responded by removing speedy tag, but, to be fair, got rid of all the obvious marketing phrases. However, the claims to notability are still very weak. I put a notability tag on but help off further action until the author had a chance to properly assert notabilty. Nothing has been done in the last two weeks. No hits on Google other than Wikipedia article. The only argument I can see in its defence is that the early ad-ridden version[1] there's a list of "BAAU accomplishments" which says all of the events were recorded in newspapers. That might just qualify as a claim to notability, but since it doesn't say which newspapers they were I can't comment any further. I'll leave this up to you lot. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - sounds a worthy organisation, but no evidence of notability. JohnCD (talk) 15:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - no assertion of notability. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 16:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Can't find notability in gsearch or gnews search. Only hits are wiki/mirrors and the organization's own site.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Fabrictramp. Article does nothing to assert notability. MvjsTalking 09:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.