Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bay Alarm Medical
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Bay Alarm Medical (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable business. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:31, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Article is promotional and short on wp:notability-suitable related. But ability to meet wp:notability looks like a real possibility 23:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- But if we take into consideration that WP is an encyclopaedia attempting to apply an even hand to articles in a global context then it is way below the threshold for inclusion. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:42, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable per the criteria at WP:CORP. Coverage found is surprisingly trivial - press releases and passing local references - for a 60-year-old company like this. None of the sources provided at the article demonstrates notability. --MelanieN (talk) 23:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not finding significant coverage in reliable sources for this company. Therefore, the topic appears at this time to fail Wikipedia's General notability guideline for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.