Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battles involving the Jat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battles involving the Jat[edit]

Battles involving the Jat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources mostly look suspect. I am also not sure that it’s common practice to create Battle list articles for ethnic groups and rather to do so for kingdoms or nations e.g. Battles involving the Maratha Empire or List of wars involving Finland. Surely it would be better to have separate articles for the kingdoms/states involved in these battles rather than just for an ethnic group. RuudVanClerk (talk) 11:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Pakistan, and India. RuudVanClerk (talk) 11:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, not all sources seem unreliable, and many sources are from good authors. Also, the nominator was blocked for WP:BATTLEGROUND editing. There is need of copyediting, but delition is not justifiable.Admantine123 (talk) 18:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- This is a horrid article in structure, but has plenty of referneces, whether or not RS. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • KEEP -- I already saw many reliable references at the article. Will review and clean up the article soon. Regards Ngrewal1 (talk) 19:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Many references are considering to be WP:RS. Expand the article with more reliable sources. -- Choose🎵 (talk) 06:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.