Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Harvest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, may not be speedy but surely is snow. Band currently at DRV and deletion not likely to be overturned either. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 20:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Battle of the Harvest[edit]
- Battle of the Harvest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I removed a speedy tag from this since those don't cover albums, but felt AfD was appropriate for this non-notable album by a band whose article was speedied because it didn't meet WP:MUSIC. Accounting4Taste:talk 00:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
the guy who deleted the main artist page locked the talk page! not cool. this article should not be deleted. alot of people have this album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scary dragon atop the hill (talk • contribs) 00:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Obscure album by an obscure band. Fails the WP:MUSIC guidelines and lacks reliable sources.--t b c ♣§♠ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 01:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—Totally non-notable album from a totally non-notable band. The article is nothing but a tracklisting, and since I couldn't find anything but PR and self-published material in searches, I doubt the article will get expanded any time soon. (Full disclosure, I improperly CSD'd this article, but it was correctly rejected as CSD applies to bands not albums. Livitup (talk) 01:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obviously. - Raj Krishnamurthy (talk) 02:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC#Albums. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and we really need a speedy deletion criteria for nn albums. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I "second that emotion"; articles about nn bands are gone quickly, but the albums hang around forever, filled with red-line links. How do we get "db-album" started? Accounting4Taste:talk 04:42, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been tried a few times in the past three months, and no one can come up with a good way to make it work. If you want to get it started, head over to WT:CSD and make a suggestion, but first I suggest you look at some of the previous ones in the logs. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 11:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And in fact, it is being tried again. Livitup (talk) 15:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete when it's by a non-notable band on a non-notable label, that's a big tip off that it's not notable. Vickser (talk) 06:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums. The article about the band has been speedied, and though it is currently at deletion review, it still doesn't look at all notable. Cheers. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 11:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 17:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.