Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle near Novi Grad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 03:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle near Novi Grad[edit]

Battle near Novi Grad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article may be about a real 16th century battle, but sources are barely available. Only one source is cited, a Slovene-language page of unclear reliability which seems to have only about one sentence about this battle. Two other sources were previously cited, but one was a Wikipedia mirror and the other was a page from Wikipedia itself. The only other source I have been able to locate is one reference in a book about the history of books in Central Europe, which I would not expect to use as a source in an article about a battle. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The current article does not establish notability and has little substantive content. It could perhaps be merged into https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbard_VIII_von_Auersperg in which this battle is already mentioned. Hmee2 (talk) 21:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete in absence of sources establishing notability. There might be something in this article, but I'm neither sufficiently well versed in this area of history to determine whether this is discussing the same battle nor knowledgeable about the publication venue to say whether it's truly a reliable source. And even if it was, one good source is not enough for notability. -Ljleppan (talk) 08:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Can't find any significant coverage.Onel5969 TT me 18:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.