Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle Lane Vol. 5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Technos Japan#List of games by platforms. Cirt (talk) 08:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Battle Lane Vol. 5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No indication that this a notable video game. ÷seresin 18:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You exclusionists miss the point of wikipedia "the sum of all knowledge of mankind" but I don't want to argue, I've given up, so delete whatever you want, see if I care. Sandman30s (talk) 21:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No assertion of notability. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 14:00, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. What makes this game non-notable, it was a commercially released arcade game. Raphie (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merely being something or other does not make a subject notable; it is verified coverage in reliable, secondary sources that does. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 01:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was going to say merge to parent article on the Battle Lane series of games but I see only Vol. 5 has a sub-stub. There is a lack of in-depth coverage in reliable sources to indicate that it is notable. Drawn Some (talk) 02:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Technos Japan#List of games by platforms Marasmusine (talk) 13:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.