Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BattleCry (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, redireting to Battle cry. Nandesuka (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BattleCry[edit]

Video game does not appear to be notable. Previously discussed last year, there was weak consensus to keep the article, pending improvements. Since then no improvements have been made. —BradV 04:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing to show that this is a notable video game. So I support deletion. Addendum: I agree that subsequent recreation as a redirect to Battle cry would be useful.seresin | wasn't he just...? 05:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
replace with redirect to dab or battle cry at the very least. if kept it should be renamed to BattleCry (1991 video game). 70.55.84.89 (talk) 05:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete KLOV lists the date as 1989 [1] not 1991, and google is not good for finding more information. In any case, nothing for an article, even though it's a real 80s arcade game - so delete unless someone can dig out a (most likely only available in printed form given the time) review about it to show notability. --Minimaki (talk) 10:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Pixelface (talk) 14:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 14:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article as a valid arcade game supported by MAME. But some of my other video games have been deleted and as a result I don't really care anymore. Whatever. Sandman30s (talk) 14:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No secondary sources, no sourced assertion of notability. Fails WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree that there appears to be no sourced assertion of notability. While there is an uneven standard applied to arcade games, they should meet a reasonable level of importance. Stormbay (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.