Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bathing

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Showering. (non-admin closure) -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 16:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bathing

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Waste of many gallons of water. Showering is better if you want to keep clean while saving the environment. 1033Forest (talk) 04:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as showering is better to the environment. Toadette ^{(April Fools Day!)} 05:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to perfume. Water is not needed.—Alalch E. 10:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reuse the water for your next bath. 132.234.229.33 (talk) 12:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. Obvious that the nom has a COI with Big Soap, and I suspect even UPE from either Mr. Colgate or Mr. Palmolive, trying to nullify Messrs. Proctor or Gamble's contributions to the field. Oaktree b (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Wikipedia is not a soapbox. BBQboffin^{grill me} 18:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.