Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bass-o-matic
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bass-o-matic[edit]
This was a joke product used in a 1976 Saturday Night Live sketch (although the correct name was the "Super Bass-o-matic '76"). I was considering redirecting this to Saturday Night Live, but that was tried before and someone reverted it, but I don't think this is notable enough for its own article. Masaruemoto 20:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sad delete Although it's a classic SNL commercial, there just isn't enough here to justify its own article. If other references were produced and used to lengthen the article, I'd be happy to reconsider (but very surprised). --ElKevbo 20:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's funny, but it's not notable. Delete. YechielMan 15:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I wonder if, once deleted, it will only reappear again? It's sort of a cultural meme. Personally, I'd like to see it remain (so I could send the link to someone, saying, "Here, THIS is what I'm talking about") but I don't feel that I know enough about Wikipedia policy to vote. I did some searching and added a little further substance, and didn't come up with much. The article is pretty much covered in Dan Aykroyd anyway. It'd be nice if we could get a copy of the clip in wikimedia, but it'll be copyrighted. (Eventually to wind up in a museum?) Abstain. thundt 20:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No real world context, fails WP:FICT. Jay32183 03:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete although at my house we still call the blender the bass-o-matic. But no potential for growth, simply too fine a level of detail for an article. Herostratus 04:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.