Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baskut Tuncak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Baskut Tuncak[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A special rapporteur is not covered under WP:DIPLOMAT, thus I don't see how this article can pass notability guidelines. Also fails GNG. 1l2l3k (talk) 00:59, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Please do not delete.I am working to improve the article as adviced.Thank you. Alex-h (talk) 17:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the changes required as possible. Request removal of the deletion tag. Alex-h (talk) 00:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Searching for "Baskut Tuncak", one must admit that Tuncak has been quoted very often, look at Gnews hits. But can anybody find any sources that talk about Tuncak? Right now, the article sounds a lot like a CV amalgamation of http://www.srtoxics.org/about/bio/ and https://rwi.lu.se/staff/baskut-tuncak/ and fails [[WP:BASIC]]/[[WP:GNG]]. Sam Sailor 16:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 16:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 16:52, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:15, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Baskut Tuncak is United Nations Special Rapporteur without adequate in-depth coverage in reliable sources.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 08:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not satisfy the GNG due to lack of coverage of the subject. EnPassant (talk) 18:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article Baskut Tuncak, I have edited a few times, in total I have put more than 23 sources. His UN mandate was renewed in September 2017 for another 3 years, so it satisfies WP:GNG and WP:DIPLOMAT. I believe the decision now should be keep Alex-h (talk) 22:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no prejudice for future recreation when there's better sourcing. Existing sourcing is mostly just examples of subject being quoted as is WP:ROUTINE. Chetsford (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.