Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basil Becon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 23:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Basil Becon[edit]

Basil Becon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He existed, but how did he meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG? Thomas Brceon was written about, rather than Basil. Boleyn (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No assertion of notability.Jahaza (talk) 23:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- His father was notable and has am article in Oxford DNB, but he was no more than a NN clergyman. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.