Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Based on Evil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tantara. (non-admin closure) J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Based on Evil

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sourced to show this work meets WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. Blabbermouth.net offers a press release of the album pending release Sputnik music offers a user review and the AllMusic entry doesn't even have a track listing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the album was reviewed in two Norwegian newspapers, Tønsbergs Blad and Østlendingen. This is underground music. Geschichte (talk) 14:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to confirm that those papers reviewed this album. If it comes up for air and generates WP:SIGCOV, then it can be re-created. Until then, it doesn't appear to qualify under WP:BAND or WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: me saying that they reviewed the album is confirmation. However, it's undoudbtedly underground music. Geschichte (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A date and page number for the reviews would go a long way to help confirm that the reviews exist. No offense, you're not a reliable source. August 2012 is not that long ago. It would also help to know who the reviewer(s) was (were). Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One last re-list to see if Geschichte, can provide RS at this AfD, otherwise it is leaning to Delete
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 10:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Tantara where the album is already referenced. I am suggesting a redirect as opposed to a deletion as this could be a useful search term/redirect for anyone looking for information on this album. I agree with Walter Görlitz in suggesting that Geschichte provides further details on these supposed newspaper sources to prove their existence. However, with that being said, I do not think reviews in two newspapers is enough coverage to justify an independent article as those reviews could be added to the article on the band. Aoba47 (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Aoba47. Additionally the article is almost completely unsourced and fails WP:V. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.