Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry J. Farber
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Barry J. Farber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, fails g test, autobiographical Dancecarry09876 (talk) 22:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Note that this AFD nomination was made by a sockpuppet of User:Bothpath , in an apparent attempt to hide the evidence of their recent vandalism[1], [2] in the article's category. User then tried to clear out their talk page with this SP edit. MuffledThud (talk) 10:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - numerous Ghits from WP:RS, see http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&q=barry+farber+motivational&cf=all: please see comment above on vandalism and sockpuppetry. Tagging article for rescue. MuffledThud (talk) 10:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per WP:AFTER. Notable author, often quoted by others. Plenty of sources available for cleanup of BLP. Bad form if nominated by an abusive sockpuppet account. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - He is a notable author and the article has appropriate references. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 12:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.