Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrage (Transformers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 02:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barrage (Transformers)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor fictional character which does not appear to have sufficient significant third-party references. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge, as Barrage is one of the Insecticons, and other Insecticons who came up for Deletion were merged to Insecticons, that seems to be a logical outcome. Mathewignash (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 19:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliably sourced coverage to support claim of notability. In-world cruft is insufficient. Tarc (talk) 03:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficent sources of reliable quality to justify a solo article.Dwanyewest (talk) 16:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of sources that are both reliable and independent enough to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: With no secondary sources, there is no objective evidence that the fictional character meets the general notability guideline. As the content is barely referenced with tertiary sources that are not independent of the subject and the article title is not a plausible search term due to the disambiguation, I believe that deletion is in order. Jfgslo (talk) 23:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.