Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron, Angelo von Möller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Baron, Angelo von Möller

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in independent sources to establish notability. User:MVA33 is clear WP:COI editor as photo is marked own work. Boneymau (talk) 01:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 01:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 01:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - Not notable. Should be A7 speedy delete. Acnetj (talk) 07:50, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Does G4 apply to speedy deletions? Because Angelo von Möller has already been deleted per A7 a few weeks ago. Presumably the "Baron" is an attempt to get around that. ~~Seventeen~~Thirteen-year-old "art collectors" are rarely notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

he's 13. Just sayin'.104.163.147.121 (talk) 22:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ack. I ran out of fingers ... Clarityfiend (talk) 00:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo von Möller, Baron von Möller Acnetj (talk) 08:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plain old Angelo was A7'd on 6 March, the baron on 12 January. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seriously? Lets do this through AFD, then further recreations under new and exciting titles can be dealt with through G4. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:36, 24 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Delete for lack of notability. I nominate the creation of this article for Wikipedia Chutzpah of the Year. Or the hour. -The Gnome (talk) 10:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt all name variants: No evidence of attained notability provided or found. AllyD (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt. It's wasting of our time to go thru AfD for this again. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks notability, and fails WP:GNG. Z359q (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT and SNOW CLOSE. Thanks for wasting our time. 104.163.147.121 (talk) 22:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and SALT per above. Shellwood (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG, nothing available thru a gsearch, also could be a case of WP:TOOSOON? great that a young person is doing this, but WP:NOTPROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:58, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Anybody notice that his collecting period of "early 2000s" translates to "before he was born"? And is Baron a title or part of his given name? RobDuch (talk) 23:55, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You must be referring to his in utero period.104.163.147.121 (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is an article on someone ridiculously far from being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's snowballing in here. Theredproject (talk) 22:56, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My sincere thanks to every admin who checks up on this AfD and allows it run for some more time. It's become something of a morning ritual to read this still developing, still alive, devastatingly obviouski discussion about a completely ridiculous idea of an article. Ahh, that coffee was truly something, again today, thank you very much. -The Gnome (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's only been three days, and the rule is that if you got yourself onto the wiki it runs for a week, mainly so that you can show your grade nine school buddies your Wikipedia page, on your phone, at lunchtime, while you are smoking a joint, at the far side of the parking lot. While laughing hysterically.104.163.147.121 (talk) 09:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting rid of the article is not so pressing and urgent to justify ignoring the usual time that we provide so everyone can put in their two cents. Be patient, it will happen. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:02, 29 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

If we all pitch in here we can maybe make this happen. WP:HEY is not so far away. Also, he has a Youtube channel for his gallery, and it is good. 104.163.147.121 (talk) 09:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per everyone. _{Vermont | reply here} 01:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A7 - This article doesn't make a credible claim of significance - having a collection doesn't inherently make a person notable. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly not notable, not a mention in any credible media. How is this still going. The snowstorm has well and truly hit. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.