Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbie in A Mermaid Tale 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:30, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barbie in A Mermaid Tale 2[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found only two pieces of significant coverage. QuietCicada - Talk 00:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. QuietCicada - Talk 00:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Barbie in A Mermaid Tale in a new section titled "Sequel" near the bottom. Left guide (talk) 01:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:NFILM/GNG with a review in Common Sense Media [1] and a retrospective review in Polgyon [2] —siro χ o 02:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NFILM sources mentioned by Siroxo by way of the nomination. This is a full article about a film featuring the now iconic character (and mermaids). Randy Kryn (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Either Redirect as suggested by Left guide above, or~~ Keep, as some sources have been presented by QuietCicada and Siroxo, to which one can add, in Fr., a rapid assessment here. Opposed to deletion anyway. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC) (Edited 12/24 after checking the source presented by Atlantic306, below.)[reply]
Keep: Subject meets WP:NFILM and the WP:GNG from the sources the nom and siroxo have found. User:Let'srun 15:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can never understand noms for sequel movies when the first doesn't get nominated at all; here, its notability is self-evident as a sequel film for a notable property. Nate • (chatter) 02:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As mentioned above, meets notability guidelines.

Tooncool64 (talk) 21:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in view of the reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion, also found this review in a Dutch film magazine here so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above, various reviews have it meet WP:NFILM Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:37, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Barbie in A Mermaid Tale. Only two sources have been found so far, plus two unreliable blogs. This does not pass WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t know what the above comment refers to as ’unreliable blogs’ but neither the French Quels films pour les Enfants nor the Dutch Cinemagazine are blogs, and I would consider them rather reliable.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:51, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.