Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbie Griffin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barbie Griffin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable "glamour model"; fails WP:ENT, no indication the subject satisfies the GNG or an other specialized guideline. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. Garden variety lawsuit has minimal coverage, but notability for that would fail under BLP1E. Survived AFD years ago as a "notable pornstar," which was rather odd since the subject has no porn credits or credentials. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails GNG and PORNBIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete essentially a BLP1E involved in a rather ho-hum name dispute lawsuit. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:12, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.