Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Riethe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 20:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Barbara Riethe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find sufficient RS indicia of notability of this person, who has been tagged for notability since 2007. Epeefleche (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notability. It shocks me that this article was hidden away since 2007 without any sooner nominations. I didn't find anything on her with Yahoo or Google. SwisterTwister talk 07:39, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Tx for your good work looking at some of these AfDs that are otherwise attracting zero focus. I share your sentiments on this one.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.