Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Harper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Harper[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than a mention by the Oregonian, which is not available online, there is no significant independent coverage of this person that I can find, despite the article's assertion to the contrary. The claimed awards are mostly from small organizations that advocate alternative birth methods. The Moose 21:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to be a large and significant amount of coverage as you would expect from an internationally recognised expert on child birth. scope_creep^Talk 10:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I conducted several different searches and found only a Pinterest page, other social media such as videos, her own websites, Amazon/Barnes & Noble/Good Reads, and citations to her books. There's a few articles by her at Midwifery Today, but nothing about her except a one-sentence blurb, the same one that appears in many mirrors. The only actual quantitative research she's done was a single survey. if she were "internationally known" then we'd see more than two hits at the Sigma Theta Tau International Nursing Society website. I found exactly one major newspaper article that quotes her. I conclude that there's not significant coverage about her in reliable sources. Please ping me if you find anything else. Bearian (talk) 02:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: all I can find is a review of Gentle Birth Choices in Library Journal vol 119 in 1994. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, following similar reasoning to Bearian. I found also an NPR piece that quotes her, but the notability case for her still looks thin to me. There might be a better case for her book. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 02:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no GNG-worthy independent sourcing. Hyperbolick (talk) 16:08, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.