Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Baker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Baker[edit]

Barbara Baker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable educator. The article on the Challenger School was deleted as non notable at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Challenger School (2nd nomination), so I do not see how founding ti could provide any notability.The material in the personal life section is in my opinion a violation of BLP1E, to the extent that it struck me as being a personal attack. DGG ( talk ) 17:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Nothing credible is written in article. Lacks substance for Wiklipedia Notability.Light21 22:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light2021 (talkcontribs)
  • Delete - Subject lacks notability. Most of the page's current references are local news outlets and the personal life section, as DGG noted, is WP:UNDUE and WP:BLP1E. Meatsgains (talk) 18:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I had talked to the user about this, and they themselves suggested it was simply not notable or acceptable enough; I see nothing to suggest there could be any better information and substance, and I would not have accepted from AfC had it been used. SwisterTwister talk 19:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Weak delete - I agree that there is doubtful notability, but I don't see how its could be classed as an attack page. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 22:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.