Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbadian Brazilian
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Barbadian Brazilian[edit]
- Barbadian Brazilian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Again, another useless article. There is nothing written about these people, in fact, the number of Barbadian Brazilians is not known. This is another "[insert nationality] Brazilian" ethnic group page created by users who don't even know anything about the population of these people, and these users leave the page almost blank or make up information using sources that does not mention anything about the population. Lehoiberri (talk) 21:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 21:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 21:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 21:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Once again, there is no use to this article. I'd even support blocking the editor if this continues--but I'd like an Admin to look into it first. Seems like there's a lot of these no-value, no-reference, no-information articles being assembled. Heck there's not even any information in it if I were interested in the topic!--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:19, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The article contains no information beyond that implied by the title. One can't create an article about an ethnicity just by combining two demonyms and saying "Fooian Barian is a Barian person of full, partial, or predominantly Fooian ancestry, or a Fooian-born person residing in Bar." This article is not even a stub-quality article. Please warn the article creator to create articles only after he has some information to put in them. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Article doesn't establish the notability of a Barbadian Brazilian and is totally unsourced. Artene50 (talk) 08:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Paul McDonald, there is alot of articles in the Brazilian section that are "[insert nationality] Brazilian" that are nothing more that almost blank pages. Just look at Template:Demographics of Brazil it is filled with groups that are not visible in Brazilian Society. The only ones that are visible are the Portuguese, Italians, Germans, Spanish, Poles, Ukrainians, Africans, Japanese, Jews, and the Arabs. I don't know about the rest. Lehoiberri (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails to establish notability. Punkmorten (talk) 10:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.