Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bansuri Guru The Film
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bansuri Guru The Film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film, no sources, article created by username same as article, appears promotional. PROD by editor who wrote in edit summary 'good film'. Skrelk (talk) 04:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete for failing WP:NF. What also needs addressing is Author's user page is identical to the article written by that user, and User:Bansuri.Guru.Film, as a username, is in violation of WP:PRODNAME. IF this film can be verified as existing, it is at least still be worth its mention in the Hariprasad Chaurasia article... but all I've been able to find is it being on Youtube. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Happy to change my mind. See below. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q.[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 22:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm unable to find coverage that would help indicate that this film meets WP:GNG or WP:NF at this time.Gong show 02:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Changing to Weak keep based on the sources presented below. Gong show 05:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]Delete.I've found one sole source about the film, which isn't enough to show that it passes notability guidelines. It would merit a mention in the main article about Hariprasad Chaurasia, but that's about it.Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Since it's already shown somewhere the standards for notability won't be as strict, but it's fairly light. I'm willing to change my vote to neutral for the time being.Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 23:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (read rationale) This IS notable. Documentary on a world famous musician by his son this is going to be an important movie. I have collected 1 or 2 sources below I am sure you'll get more sources eventually. But, yes, they have made it WP:TOOSOON. I don't know its release date, but we can keep it if it going to release in next 1-2 month(s)! --Tito Dutta (talk) 02:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing vote to !Keep. Missed that the film is already premiered at Pune International Film Festival! --Tito Dutta (talk) 02:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- And they have added few newspaper cuttings in their website too! --Tito Dutta (talk) 02:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. WP:NFF no longer applies as it has been confirmed that this film exists, has screened at a notable festival, and IS beginning to get coverage,[1][2][3] in sources that did not exist when I first commented for "delete" above. Quite happy to change my opinion now that WP:NF is shown to have been met. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.