Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangura's Vulture Paradigm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 05:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bangura's Vulture Paradigm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism (it claims to be "a new postulate" and has no relevant google hits for "vulture paradigm" -wiki). Major conflict of interest (the article's author appears to be Prof. Bangura, who was cited in the first paragraph of the original version of the article). Original research. Fails WP:COI, WP:NEO, WP:GNG, WP:OR andy (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Original research by a user whose editing of Wikipedia consists entirely of attempts to use it to publish his/her own work. (The user has, in fact stated that their contributions are "original works". I will explain on their talk page that this is not acceptable.) JamesBWatson (talk) 12:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete original research. Sparthorse (talk) 15:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pure WP:OR. ukexpat (talk) 15:36, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.