Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangs (rapper) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 15:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bangs (rapper)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the one reference currently in the article, I can't find any other reliable sources on this musician. As such, I can't find any evidence subject meets either the general notability guidelines or the notability guidelines for musicians. Unless further source can verify notability, article should be deleted. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And now that I notice that this article was previously deleted in February 2010 for the same reasons, other than the 1 additional source, it seems even more apparent that this should be deleted. As mentioned there, it may be that in the future subject qualifies, but not currently. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:17, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom. I was actually going to AfD this myself but Qwyrxian beat me to it. --Kudpung (talk) 02:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not very much reliable sources. Fails WP:MUSICIAN as quite non-notable, not much very significant coverage found. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.