Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangarang (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:58, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bangarang (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability has not been demonstrated. Fails at WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Hitro talk 08:32, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, borderline CSD A7. Only "reference" is to a streaming site. No information in the article hints at passing WP:MUSIC. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  10:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: definitely doesn't meet WP:BAND, I'd err on the side of "no" for WP:CSD#A7 because however weak it is it does make a somewhat credible claim of significance which is that they've worked with notable musicians. Still fails WP:NOTINHERITED but that's not grounds for CSD. Janet-O (talk) 11:36, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Striking out sockpuppet !vote. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.