Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangalore rocks
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bangalore rocks[edit]
- Delete - a search for "bangalore rocks entertainment" turns up nothing. Probably spam. Wickethewok 06:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Note also, that a new user interspersed comments within Wicketwok's comment, I have removed those. JoshuaZ 06:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Dont Delete Note That Bangalore Entertainment Company is a franchise of Systao Solutions Bangalore. which can be verified by sending a mail to [email protected]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.180.226 (talk • contribs)
- Comment What would seem particularly notable then??, many small companies are not that easy to find in google, doesnt mean they are not notable. i have been associated with http://www.bangalorerocks.com for a long time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.180.226 (talk • contribs)
- Delete as non-notable. Royboycrashfan 06:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable company --TBC??? ??? ??? 06:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable company, WP:CORP refers. (aeropagitica) 09:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; poorly written, not possible to establish notability. Anyone from India able to comment on this? ProhibitOnions 10:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 10:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP, though on a side note, it is too bad that the Bangalore article has no mention of its position as the hub of India's up-and-coming Rock scene.--Isotope23 19:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:corp. See [[WP:CORP} if you are still confused as to why it does not belong here. Nigelthefish 20:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.