Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandizip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bandizip[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not adhere to general notability guideline. Codename Lisa (talk) 19:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - The only refs not from the publisher are (1)a brief cnet review, borderline on establishing notability, and (2) a Ghacks Technology News article which is a how-to article, not useful for estabilshing notability. A search reveals download sites but no further significant RS coverage. Page was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 19:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.