Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banco Nossa Caixa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. KTC (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Banco Nossa Caixa[edit]
- Banco Nossa Caixa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. They have created many non-notable companies. This article has no sources establishing notability and I could find no substantial coverage establishing notability. I recognize that language could be an issue in establishing notability, so if this company is regionally, perhaps someone can find an independent reliable source. I am One of Many (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Slight merge into Banco do Brasil -- Y not? 14:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tito☸Dutta 17:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Very large and very notable business entity. No objection to considering merger of this topic. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.