Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balsamic Moon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 20:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balsamic Moon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find reliable sources to support qualification under the general notability guideline. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Spirituality and Science. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astrology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm seeing a reasonable amount of coverage in books from perfectly respectable publishers. It has an entry in DK's "Complete Idiot's Guide to Astrology, for instance.— Moriwen (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We consider the complete idiot’s guide a reliable source? Innisfree987 (talk) 06:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depends. Bearian (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would appreciate if you could elaborate. It’s not that I didn’t look at sources before nominating, it’s that they all seemed fringe rather than credibly fact-checked work. Innisfree987 (talk) 15:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep or Merge to Western astrology based on Moriwen's BEFORE. Chetsford (talk) 05:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need clearer consensus for keep !votes.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 01:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not discussed in sources outside the fringe bubble. XOR'easter (talk) 03:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. @Innisfree987, if the guide is published by Dorling Kindersley then I'd say it's more reliable than not. Did a cursory search (though I should be working) and the term does come up in terms of astrology... so it's fringe, but astrology was a big deal back in the day. Okay, to conclude lean keep. --Ouro (blah blah) 15:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - discussed in many books - per WP:BEFORE. Bearian (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.