Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balmora
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete (WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Balmora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Pure cruft. Unimportant, non-existent town. Nominate for deletion, but if not deletion, then merge with whatever game it belongs to. Crashoffer12345 (talk) 16:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Although my first impression was to immediately say delete, I did a search and found that this town is actually mentioned in reliable sources: [1] I still don't think it's notable, if anything, most of the content should be deleted and it should be merged into the page for the game. Cazort (talk) 17:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete excruciatingly unimportant, merge any relevant information to article on the game. WPISNOT a video game guide. -Drdisque (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merging and deletion are incompatible. If you believe part of the info should be merged elsewhere, the history of the material cannot be deleted. - Mgm|(talk) 09:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the game as a plausible search term (as per the source found). Has not gained enough attention to be covered separately. (Merge anything verifiable if it fits). - Mgm|(talk) 09:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree completely, I also say Redirect. Cazort (talk) 17:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 16:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball delete this is basically a copy-and-paste from [2], as indicated at the bottom of the article. Whether this is considered copyrighted text (speedy) or not is one thing, but this is in-universe and excessive for a general encyclopedia per WP:VGSCOPE. Someoneanother 17:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not a game guide, no need for a separate article on this fictional town. The game has an article.Bali ultimate (talk) 18:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious Delete. Extremely minor fictional location, nothing worth salvaging anywhere in the article, Wikipedia isn't a gameguide, certainly no coverage for the town anywhere in a reliable source, etc. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 03:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even if my house is there, this article is still a game guide lacking any notability in the real-world . ThemFromSpace 04:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.