Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ballyjamesduff killings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ballyjamesduff killings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable killings; minor incident where one killed family, no one else. It is already mentioned on the main Ballyjamesduff article, I think this is enough. It doesn't justify its own article. Nördic Nightfury 21:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 21:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 21:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

K̶e̶e̶p̶ I̶f̶ ̶I̶ ̶r̶e̶m̶e̶m̶b̶e̶r̶ ̶c̶o̶r̶r̶e̶c̶t̶l̶y̶ ̶t̶h̶i̶s̶ ̶r̶e̶c̶e̶i̶v̶e̶d̶ ̶s̶i̶g̶n̶i̶f̶i̶c̶a̶n̶t̶ ̶m̶e̶d̶i̶a̶ ̶a̶t̶t̶e̶n̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶I̶r̶e̶l̶a̶n̶d̶ Apollo The Logician (talk) 21:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Apollo The Logician:: It has been mentioned on the main article for the place this happened, suitable sources will need to be added though. I think that is enough. Nördic Nightfury 22:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per edit by OE Apollo The Logician (talk) 22:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable killing, Not even worth redirecting either. –Davey2010^Talk 01:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a terrible, terrible thing, but most family killings are not notable, and I see no indication that this one is. Search did not turn up ongoing coverage. Feel free to flag me to reconsider if someone can source notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 02:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and other comments. While covering a terrible event, in it's current form the article doesn't meet project scope per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT (and in particular long term relevance per WP:EFFECT). Guliolopez (talk) 15:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.