Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ballbank, New South Wales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 19:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ballbank, New South Wales[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ballbank is an unbounded locality within the bounded locality of Cobramunga, New South Wales about which there is nothing to say beyond the current stub, which may be included in the Cobramunga article. A redirect to Cobramunga will suffice. Crusoe8181 (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If that is the case, then this discussion is unnecessary and a requested merge discussion would be more appropriate. However merging to an article that does not exist is a little premature, perhaps. Regardless of the intricate technicalities of bounded and unbounded localities, the locality of Ballbank exists and there are reliable sources attesting to it -- Mattinbgn (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Mattinbgn (talk) 20:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep per WP:SK#1: "nominator...fails to advance an argument for deletion—perhaps only proposing a non-deletion action such as moving or merging". Colonel Warden (talk) 06:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, if that rationale is true, then the nominator should have created the Cobramunga article and redirected the Ballbank article there. There is no need to take this to AFD. Tavix | Talk 15:16, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a speedy keep situation, but the most sensible solution does appear to be to simply move the article from Ballbank to Cobramunga (leaving a redirect in its wake) and editing appropriately. Orderinchaos 22:19, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.