Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldwin family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 15:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baldwin family[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't warrant it's own article and it's not encyclopedic Novalia (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Keep article, as these :Category:Acting families also have articles: Nominator appears biased and just wants to start shit by disrespecting.

--Discographer (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. This discussion is about the Baldwin family, whose suitability for a Wikipedia article (about which I have no opinion) has no relationship to the existence of articles about other families. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are many reliable sources that give significant coverage to the Baldwin Family, as a group. A quick google search shows this. However, I think the most beefy pieces will be in entertainment magazines from the early 90s and probably not available online. --Darth Mike^(talk) 13:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per WP:GNG, WP:SNOW, and WP:BEFORE. President Clinton said, "They bombed the Baldwins!" I'm sorry, but literally a whole Oscar-nominated feature film was made based on the premise that this family is so famous that everybody would get the joke. Bearian (talk) 01:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep And seconded on the WP:SNOW make it a blizzard, close it out, etc. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.