Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker & Rannells

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Baker & Rannells

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very small law firm, no indication of notability in the article or that can be found in my own search. PROD declined by anon editor without explanation: [1]. TJRC (talk) 21:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. TJRC (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I couldn't find any indication of notability either. And also: unambiguous advertising (G11 in Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion). --Edcolins (talk) 20:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 09:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Refs only to first-party sources, business directories, etc. Seems a very ordinary firm with no indication in the article as to why it might be notable (reasons for notability might include: involvement in major cases or legal controversy, featured in other major news events, significant contribution to legal profession/jurisprudence/business, unique or highly atypical business, multiple notable partners...) --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: user who removed PROD tag seems to have been involved in promoting the company[2]. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.