Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bajsmannen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bajsmannen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, nothing to be found in reliable sources. The closest thing to a real reference I could find is this, a chatty piece of fake internet journalism from an unreliable source (see the Swedish article for Sourze, for instance). Drmies (talk) 15:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. — Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. — Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article fails WP:GNG as the subject hasn't received WP:SIGCOV (as far as I can tell). I turned up this article and this website mentioning the subject, but they aren't exactly stellar examples of WP:RS. Sailing to Byzantium (talk) 16:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - failing all notability guidelines. as of now atleast. needs sourcing.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.