Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bajo las riendas del amor (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bajo las riendas del amor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since April 2008. Article relies on a single source that is a broken link without an archived page, and even if it did exist, it probably did not make the telenovela meet WP:GNG. An internet search could not ascertain sources of more reliability, even searching for its Spanish title. Perhaps someone fluent in Spanish would be able to find sources, but I haven't found anything. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 02:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the link, which just moved to a different URL. I spent for that less than a minute.--Ymblanter (talk) 03:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: I wouldn't even have known how to begin to search for that. Do you think the article meets notability guidelines with just that or not? Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 22:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know, this is a reliable source, but i am not sure it is sufficient. Last time I voted weak keep. Searching for the source was easy: The link contained the name of the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is insufficient coverage of the subject to pass WP:GNG. I'm not convinced by the terra source as it is primarily about the actress Geraldine Bazan not the subject. I have managed to find many passing mentions in articles about past cast members, but nothing significant. Winner 42 Talk to me! 23:29, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.