Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahamas Shrimp Wranglers (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:30, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bahamas Shrimp Wranglers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable amateur football team that fails WP:GNG. Article was previously kept back in 2005, but I'm guessing notability guidelines were pretty flimsy back then! J Mo 101 (talk) 13:39, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following pages for similar reasons:

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. J Mo 101 (talk) 13:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:19, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - Up until 2008, the only truly national level of the Bahamian league was the final game between the winners of the various island leagues. Only clubs that can be shown to have competed in these matches or have competed in the BFA Senior League since 2008 (which appears to be a true nationwide league rather than a league for a specific island) can lay claim to having played at the highest national level and therefore notability. I can find no reference to any of these teams featuring in the BFA Senior League from these links. Despite Quality Superstars apparently winning an island league in 2004, RSSSF shows the national final did not take place in that year, so they do not qualify for notability as they have not played at the highest possible level. Fenix down (talk) 11:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - no indication of any of these clubs meeting project specific guidelines as above; no indication the topics have been the subject of significant coverage either. C 679 21:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.