Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagatelle (literary technique)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Closing as new consensus since there has been no further discussion after two relists. (non-admin closure) sst 08:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bagatelle (literary technique)[edit]

Bagatelle (literary technique) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is nothing but a dictionary entry. RichardOSmith (talk) 20:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This is a literary form used by major authors such as Swift and Franklin. The musical equivalent has an article, explaining the form – Bagatelle (music) – and so there's some scope to expand this page too. The worst case is that we would merge into another page such as light verse. Andrew D. (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep only if it can be improved and although my first search at Books found nothing, if it is widely used and common it can be accepted. SwisterTwister talk 06:48, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 14:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.