Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baek Ji Young discography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:08, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baek Ji Young discography[edit]

List of songs by Baek Ji Young, the only important parts, the album titles are already included in her article. there are no sources or meaningful content beyond the list and nothing to suggest it merits an article Jac16888 ^Talk 18:49, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Why isn't this page translated into English? Niteshift36 (talk) 19:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was listed at WP:Pages needing translation into English for a while, but removed. It was probably inappropriate for that page, which seems to be for articles that are in another language in their entirety. If there's a vehicle to request translation of parts of a page, I'm unable to find it. I could transliterate the titles. That's a tedious but essentially mechanical process; but I can't translate it. I'm a bit embarrassed that I noted this article for cleanup over a year ago and have had it on my to-do list for all that time. TJRC (talk) 15:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back to artists page. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, or split to separate articles per WP:NALBUMS. Generally, each album released by a notable artist (and Baek Ji Young's notability is not at issue) has its own article. The only issue here is that those articles are combined into a single discography article. I would not object to splitting the page to individual articles, but it clearly should not be deleted. Also, I don't understand the assertion that the contents of the albums are unimportant parts. TJRC (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @125 · 01:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @134 · 02:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @134 · 02:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't see any reason to delete this (cleanup is not a valid reason). Sure the thing needs references, but it is highly unlikely that a successful artist with a couple of albums would never have been written about. I don't have any such sources--but the nominator hasn't proved there aren't any either. Drmies (talk) 02:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.