Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bada Ganpati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bada Ganpati[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete : No citations & references, Orphan, The existence of Place is unverified. Abu Torsam 18:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It can be verified by a Google search, see WP:BEFORE. That it is an orphan is not reason to delete. There are plenty of images that might be added. Whether it meets WP:GNG is one of taste or opinion. Rescue? Bearian (talk) 01:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article simply lists "Bada Ganapati" temples in three cities but doesn't claim notability for any one( seeSiddhivinayak temple (Mumbai) for a famous temple dedicated to Ganesh). Going by the links provided by Bearian, the temple in Indore seems to be a the more popular among the three. Willing to reconsider if author establishes notability. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 09:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Deepak. Culturalrevival (talk) 01:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.