Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Spirits
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 14:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bad Spirits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Non-notable film, fails WP:NF. CultureDrone (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly fails notability requirements. Dgf32 (talk) 23:29, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete
keepas deletion is not so clear now that the article has ben expanded and sourced. Pity about the author's COI. If he had only pointed the way to some better reviews.... (sigh) Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:01, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Keep, for the same reasons. Laurent paris (talk) 04:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - yes, sources have been found; no, they don't indicate notability by virtue of their existence. It does not help either that none of the actors' bluelinks are to unrelated articles. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 05:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yes, the sources found still do not establish notability. Dgf32 (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.