Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bacteria Tower Defense
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Carioca (talk) 01:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bacteria Tower Defense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested CSD. Page does not assert notability. Except for the one to the webpage's about page, the references do not make reference to "Bacteria Tower Defense". Deadly∀ssassin 00:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:N. Ketsuekigata (talk) 00:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article is basically an advertisement for the game. Add to that it isn't even notable. Rgoodermote 00:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. ♥Shapiros10WuzHere♥ 00:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - aside from the fact that the article is written like an advertisement, it asserts no notability through reliable sources independent of the topic. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 01:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a spammy article about a non-notable game Bfigura (talk) 04:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Possible redirect to tower defense, though more in favor of deletion. --Izno (talk) 07:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, advertisment for a non-notable game. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Strong delete. Provide some reliable third party references or let this one go. Randomran (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an advertisement.--Berig (talk) 16:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ADVERT Gary King (talk) 19:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.