Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bacon, Washington
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bacon, Washington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A location on a UP line that was abandoned pretty early, although it's a sign of the desolation of the area that the right-of-way is still plain some seventy years since. No evidence of a town that I found. Mangoe (talk) 04:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect or even possible Merge to Grant County. Philosophy2 (talk) 07:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unclear what purpose this would serve at the Grant County article, though of course that's easier than spending more time discussing these bulk creations individually. Reywas92Talk 15:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not finding anything on this one. MB 02:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, Do Not Merge - We don't typically list former post offices in county articles, and there's no reason to believe that there was ever anything else here. –dlthewave ☎ 02:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - You couldn't find a better example of why "People who worked on the railway gave this place a name, so it must have been a thriving town at some point" is obviously defective logic. FOARP (talk) 09:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.